This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: pending/6575: =09-ftrapv doesn't catch multiplication overflow
- From: Bruno Haible <bruno at clisp dot org>
- To: neil at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 21:58:39 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: pending/6575: =09-ftrapv doesn't catch multiplication overflow
- References: <20020513191854.26997.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
neil@gcc.gnu.org writes:
> Duplicate of 6578. Please submit your PRs so they
> don't go into category "pending".
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6575
6575, 6578, 6586 are all the same. I resubmitted twice because for the
first two submits I got failure notices:
<gnats-admin@gcc.gnu.org>:
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)
Note: There was a bad value `=09no' for the field `>Confidential:'.
It was set to the default value of `yes'.
Note: There was a bad value `=09serious' for the field `>Severity:'.
It was set to the default value of `serious'.
Note: There was a bad value `=09medium' for the field `>Priority:'.
It was set to the default value of `medium'.
Note: There was a bad value `=09=09sw-bug' for the field `>Class:'.
It was set to the default value of `sw-bug'.
Then I understood that the gnats scripts don't understand the tabs
that by default were in the form that "gccbug" presented me, so I
replaced them with spaces and resubmitted. In all three cases I had
Category: c
Bruno