This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: target/6569: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 C testsuite regression incompile/20011119-2.c




--On Tuesday, May 07, 2002 03:14:49 PM +0200 Franz Sirl 
<Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> wrote:

> At 14:45 07.05.2002, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
>>  > From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
>>  >
>>  > >> Can you try the attached patch? It seems to work for me, but the
>>  > >> bootstrap hasn't completed yet. While I was at it, I improved the
>>  > >> placing of the warning messages. I'm still a bit confused, cause it
>>  > >> sometimes seems olddecl and newdecl appeared to be swapped
>>  > >> compared to their sourcefile ordering.
>>  > >
>>  > > FYI, bootstrap+regtest on x86-linux-gnu completed successfully.
>>  >
>>  > OK; once you have confirmation of the SPARC results go ahead and
>>  > check it in.
>>
>> Unfortunately, the patch did not solve the problem listed in the PR.
>> I still get the same 'as' errors from compile/20011119-2.c
>>
>> compile/20011119-2.c:3: warning: weak declaration of `foo' after first
>> use  results in unspecified behavior
>> /usr/ccs/bin/as: "/var/tmp//ccQOIg1d.s", line 51: error: invalid operand
>> --------------------------------------------------^^^^^
>
> Yeah, I managed to get access to a solaris-2.8 machine, even though I
> wasn't able to bootstrap with Solaris as/ld (see below), I was able to
> reproduce the failure. Re-checking on x86-linux-gnu revealed that it even
> doesn't fix the problem there, so I must have mixed something up
> yesterday. Frankly, I'm a bit at a loss here, cause I've tried several
> strategies yesterday and they either didn't fix the testcase or caused
> some of the weak tests to fail. Especially I tried to use the TREE_USED
> flag of the WEAK_DECLS TREE_LIST to mark when a weak already had been
> assembled, but it didn't work out :-(. I seem to misunderstand something
> about how the tree structures are handled.

I'll look into this problem.

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]