This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Your Jan 8th, 2001 rtlanal.c:note_stores change
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 09:56:43 -0700
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 09:26:39AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> (All uses of this PARALLEL reg thing use it for consequetive hard
> registers, there is not reason to generalize it to allow arbitray
> disjoint sets of registers to be described).
This is false. Look at a structure that contains floats
and integers on sparc64.
Indeed, you are right. Amusing that I missed this since I've been
playing with this code.