This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: preprocessor/6084: cpp Segmentation Fault
- From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
- To: "Gerwin, Joshua A" <joshua dot a dot gerwin at intel dot com>
- Cc: "'neil at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <neil at gcc dot gnu dot org>,"'gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>,"'gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org>,"'joshg at hf dot intel dot com'" <joshg at hf dot intel dot com>,"'nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org>,"'rnesius at ichips dot intel dot com'" <rnesius at ichips dot intel dot com>,"Nguyen, Tuan" <tuan dot nguyen at intel dot com>,"'gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 20:06:38 +0000
- Subject: Re: preprocessor/6084: cpp Segmentation Fault
- References: <01BDB7EEF8D4D3119D95009027AE999511A3D58D@FMSMSX33>
Gerwin, Joshua A wrote:-
> A minor experiment in option removal shows that the problem is potentially
> tied to the
> -dD tag. Compare:
>
[...]
>
> A clue, no?
A clue, but not much more. Sadly I can't reproduce the issue on x86
Linux.
Would you mind running it through gdb, and giving a backtrace of the
line it segfaults on, and any relevant-looking variables?
Thanks,
Neil.