This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: preprocessor/6084: cpp Segmentation Fault
- From: neil at gcc dot gnu dot org
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, joshg at hf dot intel dot com, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, rnesius at ichips dot intel dot com, tuan dot nguyen at intel dot com
- Date: 29 Mar 2002 08:20:23 -0000
- Subject: Re: preprocessor/6084: cpp Segmentation Fault
- Reply-to: neil at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, joshg at hf dot intel dot com, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, rnesius at ichips dot intel dot com, tuan dot nguyen at intel dot com, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Synopsis: cpp Segmentation Fault
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: neil
State-Changed-When: Fri Mar 29 00:20:22 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Changed to category preprocessor; not a front end issue.
Quite a surpise to me, too. I take pride in cpp not segfaulting 8-)
Could you give me a testcase? I can't reproduce it with
the information supplied.
Or, could you try 3.0.4? There was a segfault fixed in the
later 3.0 cycle, triggered by a combination of command
line options, but I'm not sure which 3.0.x got it.
Judging by your command line, I suspect it is caused by
a certain combination of switches; can you reproduce it
on a simple file like #include <stdio.h> or something?
Alternatively, if you can't produce a simple testcase, but can get it to happen on Linux, then please send me the files so I can track this down, or tell me where it happens when you're debugging the cpp0 binary.
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6084