This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: bootstrap/3589: GCC 3.0-CVS illegal instruction on hppa1.1-proelf
- From: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com>
- To: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, joel at gcc dot gnu dot org, vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 08:26:26 -0600
- Subject: Re: bootstrap/3589: GCC 3.0-CVS illegal instruction on hppa1.1-proelf
- Organization: OAR Corporation
- References: <3C9F4E30.B24358BD@redhat.com>
Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>
> Hello, Joel. I've just analyzed the problem report. It seems to me a
> binutils bug. Gas manual clearly says that .subspace pseudo-op should
> work for SOM and ELF:
>
> When `as' generates SOM or ELF output for the HPPA, `as' can also
> generate whatever other named sections you specify using the `.space'
> and `.subspace' directives. See `HP9000 Series 800 Assembly Language
> Reference Manual' (HP 92432-90001) for details on the `.space' and
> `.subspace' assembler directives.
>
> Looking at the assembler sources I see that the subspace is processed
> only for SOM.
>
> I am going to close the problem.
>
> Could you resubmit the bug into binutils gnat.
I have been off a few days and know that Jeff has provided feedback but
wanted to know if the resolution was to make GAS accept SOM directives
in ELF mode or to fix gcc where it didn't generate SOM directives in
ELF mode?
Is there any ifdef to check and decide which directives to use?
And if there is any reference mapping between them, I would appreciate
knowing about it.
> Best regards, Vladimir Makarov
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3589
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985