This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: c/5830: The compiler crashes



On Fri, 08 Mar 2002 19:29:30 +0100
Gwenole Beauchesne <gbeauchesne@mandrakesoft.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> It doesn't appear to be fixed on the gcc-3.0-branch. On gcc-3.1-branch, 
> that appears to have been fixed with Jan's crossjumping patch of 2001/07/16:
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-07/msg01030.html>
> 
> On 3.0-branch, gcc ICEs with the testcase of that PR and -O2 level. 
> However, it doesn't ICE with -O2 and -fno-reorder-blocks.
> 
> With the following patch, derived from Jan's, 3.0-branch bootstrapped 
> and regtested OK. Note that if I make cleanup_cfg() after 
> reorder_basic_blocks() too, bootstrap fails. So I don't think that patch 
> is good enough.
> 
> 2002-03-08  Gwenole Beauchesne  <gbeauchesne@mandrakesoft.com>
>    
>     PR c/5830
>     * toplev.c (rest_of_compilation): Do cleanup_cfg before
>     bb-reorder. [From Jan Hubicka for gcc-3.1, 2001/07/16]
> 
> --- gcc-3.0.4/gcc/toplev.c.reorder-blocks    Fri Mar  8 14:10:00 2002
> +++ gcc-3.0.4/gcc/toplev.c    Fri Mar  8 15:45:46 2002
> @@ -3636,12 +3636,16 @@
>      = optimize > 0 && only_leaf_regs_used () && leaf_function_p ();
>  #endif
>  
> -  if (optimize > 0 && flag_reorder_blocks)
> +  if (optimize > 0)
>      {
>        timevar_push (TV_REORDER_BLOCKS);
>        open_dump_file (DFI_bbro, decl);
> -
> -      reorder_basic_blocks ();
> +     
> +      /* Last attempt to optimize CFG, as life analyzis possibly removed
> +         some instructions.  */
> +      cleanup_cfg ();
> +      if (flag_reorder_blocks)
> +          reorder_basic_blocks ();
>  
>        close_dump_file (DFI_bbro, print_rtl_with_bb, insns);
>        timevar_pop (TV_REORDER_BLOCKS);
> 
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5830 
> 
I have seen the problem when compiling my Scheme->C compiler. This compiler
is bootstrapped and it produces huge probably unusual C files. If you want
me to test the whole compiler with a new version of GCC please, let me know.
I you think that it could help, I could do this test for you.

Sincerely,

-- 
Manuel


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]