This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/2101: ICE: Tree check: expected integer_cst, have minus_expr in process_init_constructor, at cp/typeck2.c:6process_init_constructor, at cp/typeck2.c:674
- From: rodrigc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, niemayer at isg dot de, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 7 Mar 2002 03:58:21 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/2101: ICE: Tree check: expected integer_cst, have minus_expr in process_init_constructor, at cp/typeck2.c:6process_init_constructor, at cp/typeck2.c:674
- Reply-to: rodrigc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, niemayer at isg dot de, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Old Synopsis: expression in structure initializer in template causes ICE
New Synopsis: ICE: Tree check: expected integer_cst, have minus_expr in process_init_constructor, at cp/typeck2.c:6process_init_constructor, at cp/typeck2.c:674
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: rodrigc
State-Changed-When: Wed Mar 6 19:58:20 2002
State-Changed-Why:
With gcc 3.0.4, I get:
a.cc: In function `void foo()':
a.cc:9: Tree check: expected integer_cst, have minus_expr in
process_init_constructor, at cp/typeck2.c:674
With gcc version 3.1 20020302 (prerelease) it compiles fine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2101