This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 6 GCC regressions, 6 new, with your patch on 2002-01-29T19:24:37Z.
- From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:22:35 +0000
- Subject: Re: 6 GCC regressions, 6 new, with your patch on 2002-01-29T19:24:37Z.
- References: <200201292158.g0TLw6f14961@maat.cygnus.com>
GCC regression checker wrote:-
> With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
> used to pass. There are 6 new failures, and 0
> failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
> have been fixed.
>
> The new failures are:
> powerpc-eabisim gdb.sum gdb.base/bitfields.exp:
> powerpc-eabisim gdb.sum gdb.base/setvar.exp:
> native gdb.sum gdb.base/bitfields.exp:
> native gdb.sum gdb.base/call-ar-st.exp:
> native gdb.sum gdb.base/call-rt-st.exp:
> native gdb.sum gdb.base/setvar.exp:
This is obviously a result of my bitfield patch. Sadly, I'm no expert
on GDB or debug info. Is this likely to be a debug info issue, or maybe
that GDB has a similar bug to what the C front end had? I've not got
much clue where to start here 8:(
Neil.