This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Abort in redirect_edge_and_branch on vax at line 866
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, John David Anglin <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:31:27 -0700
- Subject: Re: Abort in redirect_edge_and_branch on vax at line 866
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
> Yep. The old delete_insn is now delete_related_insns, and iirc
> is now only used from dbr_schedule. And if we can convince Eric
> to finish the new dbr pass we talked about ... ;-)
Cool.
> > Probably the only problem that I can envision arising now would be
> > looking at BLOCK_{HEAD,END} and getting back an insn that has been
deleted
> > and removed from the chain of insns.
>
> Surprise! delete_insn now takes care of this as well. See
> the end of remove_insn.
Even better!
jeff
jeff