This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: recent 3.0.3 regression for g++.pt/memtemp100.C

From: Bob Wilson <bwilson at tensilica dot com>
To: Graham Stott <grahams at redhat dot com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, "gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:48:26 -0800
Subject: Re: recent 3.0.3 regression for g++.pt/memtemp100.C
Organization: Tensilica, Inc.
References: <133210000.1006971014@gandalf.codesourcery.com> <3C053B07.94FF1411@tensilica.com> <3C053C77.427F7551@redhat.com>

[Get raw message]

Good call (and I apologize for not checking this earlier myself).  The
"_U" gets replaced by "0x00000001" with the SPARC version, so that the
parser sees "template <class 0x00000001>" instead of "template <class
_U>".

Sorry, Mark.  I'll go look through recent iostream changes to figure out
the source of the problem.

Graham Stott wrote:
> 
> Bob,
> 
> Use --save-temps and look at the .ii file near the location of the parse error
> it might be caused by something in the header files included be <iostream>

-- 
Bob Wilson                      Tel: (408) 327-7312
Tensilica, Inc.                 Fax: (408) 986-8919
3255-6 Scott Blvd.              email: bwilson@tensilica.com
Santa Clara, CA 95054

Follow-Ups:
- Re: recent 3.0.3 regression for g++.pt/memtemp100.C
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Re: recent 3.0.3 regression for g++.pt/memtemp100.C
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: recent 3.0.3 regression for g++.pt/memtemp100.C
  - From: Bob Wilson
- Re: recent 3.0.3 regression for g++.pt/memtemp100.C
  - From: Graham Stott

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]