This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Possible variadic macro bug


These macros should, IMHO, do the same thing:

#define panic(x,...) _panic(x, __FILE__ , __LINE__ , ## __VA_ARGS__)
#define panic(x,...) _panic(x, __FILE__ , __LINE__, ## __VA_ARGS__)

In fact, the second seems to omit __LINE__ when there are no args in '...'.

This is tested with gcc 2.95.3.

While I'm at it, the documentation for ISO's __VA_ARGS__ in extend.texi
is misleading.  While it's true that, given
	#define debug(format, ...) fprintf (stderr, format, __VA_ARGS__)
you can't omit the comma, you *could* write
	#define debug(format ...) fprintf(stderr, format __VA_ARGS__)
in C99, and then the comma is optional.  (See 6.10.3, paragraph 10, for
the description.)

-s


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]