This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Another NaT bit propagation bug.
- To: Andrew Macleod <amacleod at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: Another NaT bit propagation bug.
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 10:19:48 -0800
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <200111091654.IAA23008@rtl.cygnus.com>
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 08:54:27AM -0800, Andrew Macleod wrote:
> I couldn't find a decent/logical place to put the 2 routines
> that are currently in toplev.c... suggestions?
life.c?
I also think you'll get better results if you place the
initialization in the same block as the sets. Make sure
to update the LOG_LINKS if you run this after regular
life analysis.
> We can use the flag to selectivly turn on the optimization just
> for the targets we care about.
As I demonstrated, I think _all_ targets will likely want this.
r~