This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: SH failures - analyzis

To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, bernds at redhat dot com
Subject: Re: SH failures - analyzis
From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:37:11 +0200
References: <20010815131611.S19872@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20010815143853.D11747@redhat.com>

> On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 01:16:11PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Reload then puts register X to stack and generate memory for it - it
> > is valid for SH, as it allows constant indexes in memory that are
> > divisible by 4.  During subreg elimination, the compilation crashes,
> > as memory if offsetted by 2 and thats no longer valid address.
> > 
> > What appears to be the proper solution?
> 
> I'd say the address should have been reloaded as well.
It did - the problem came indirectly via RTX sharing problem I sent a fix for
yesterday.

Honza
> 
> 
> r~

References:
- SH failures - analyzis
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: SH failures - analyzis
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]