This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: native gdb.sum gdb.base/interrupt.exp

To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: native gdb.sum gdb.base/interrupt.exp
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 13:17:28 -0700
Cc: jh at suse dot cz, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010803094648.A7461@redhat.com> <oru1zoyk4y.fsf@feijoada.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 05:16:13PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> How about renaming main() and generating an alternate main() that gets
> the stack aligned then calls the renamed function?  Then, even main()
> would have the stack frame aligned?

And play hell with debugging in a different way?  No thanks.


r~

References:
- native gdb.sum gdb.base/interrupt.exp
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: native gdb.sum gdb.base/interrupt.exp
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]