This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: ostream and long long

To: David Durham <david dot durham at wcom dot com>
Subject: Re: ostream and long long
From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 12:49:33 -0400
Cc: Andris Pavenis <andris at hal dot astr dot lu dot lv>, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107261104440.29768-100000@hal.astr.lu.lv> <996164051.9237.77.camel@yardath.jxn.wcom.com> <20010726123716.B677@disaster.jaj.com> <996166029.20932.80.camel@yardath.jxn.wcom.com>

On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 11:47:08AM -0500, David Durham wrote:
> Well, I know long longs work in general... Aren't you just talking about
> the library?  printf("%lld",long long) works just fine...

Ah, that's good to know.  I couldn't recall whether long long was supported
for 2.5.1, and I don't have any such boxes to test.

Phil

-- 
Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
                                     - anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC

References:
- Re: ostream and long long
  - From: Andris Pavenis
- Re: ostream and long long
  - From: David Durham
- Re: ostream and long long
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: ostream and long long
  - From: David Durham

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]