Re: ostream and long long

[Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>]

Andris Pavenis <andris@hal.astr.lu.lv> writes:

| On 26 Jul 2001, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| 
| > Andris Pavenis <andris@hal.astr.lu.lv> writes:
| >
| > | > If --enable-long-long, then the accompanying C99 mathematical
| > | > functions should be availble for long long support.  They are not
| > | > unreleated.
| > | >
| > |
| > | Do we really need sqrtf(), sqrtl(), sinl() and similar functions to
| > | support long long? I think the best would be to check for functions
| > | we really need for --enable-long-long instead of disabling it
| > | if at least one of functions added with c99 is missing
| >
| > We did similar things in the past.  Please check the archive for
| > the numerous complains and discussions about configure time & checking
| > separately for truly minimal subsets.
| >
| 
| I think it's not so complicate.

Nobody said it is complicate -- it was even done in the past.

Did you read the archive?

|  (I think one will not feel any difference).

Experience shows the contrary.  Again see the archive.

-- Gaby