This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: ostream and long long

To: David Durham <david dot durham at wcom dot com>
Subject: Re: ostream and long long
From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 18:27:15 -0400
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>, Andris Pavenis <andris at hal dot astr dot lu dot lv>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107252159520.21407-100000@hal.astr.lu.lv> <fly9pcenxg.fsf@jambon.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> <996095100.15180.51.camel@yardath.jxn.wcom.com> <20010725171335.I28467@disaster.jaj.com> <996099849.20762.57.camel@yardath.jxn.wcom.com>

On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 05:24:09PM -0500, David Durham wrote:
> Well... the only thing in config.log I found about 'long long' is this:
> 
> 607: configure:3522: checking for enabled ISO C99 support
> 608: configure:3568: checking for enabled long long support
> 609: configure:3578: checking for c header strategy to use

How about c++config.h, either in your build or installation directory?

-- 
Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
                                     - anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ostream and long long
  - From: David Durham
- Re: ostream and long long
  - From: Andris Pavenis

References:
- Re: ostream and long long
  - From: Andris Pavenis
- Re: ostream and long long
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: ostream and long long
  - From: David Durham
- Re: ostream and long long
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: ostream and long long
  - From: David Durham

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]