This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libstdc++/3759: nonconforming use of unqualified std:: names
- To: <ljrittle at gcc dot gnu dot org>,"Gabriel Dos Reis" <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Re: libstdc++/3759: nonconforming use of unqualified std:: names
- From: "David Abrahams" <david dot abrahams at rcn dot com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 12:51:16 -0400
- Cc: <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>,<gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org>,<nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- References: <20010723232357.23398.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> <fl8zhen1xq.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
There are open issues related to the problem I illustrated, but there's
agreement in the LWG that an implementation has no right to exhibit the
behavior I illustrated. The fact that we're discussing related things
doesn't change that.
-Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gabriel Dos Reis" <gdr@codesourcery.com>
To: <ljrittle@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: <david.abrahams@rcn.com>; <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>;
<gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>; <nobody@gcc.gnu.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 4:53 AM
Subject: Re: libstdc++/3759: nonconforming use of unqualified std:: names
> ljrittle@gcc.gnu.org writes:
>
> | Synopsis: nonconforming use of unqualified std:: names
> |
> | State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
> | State-Changed-By: ljrittle
> | State-Changed-When: Mon Jul 23 16:23:56 2001
> | State-Changed-Why:
> | We violate section 14.6.4 of C++98 in the library
> | implementation in any case where we use functions
> | available from namespace std that are being treated
> | as "dependent names".
>
> To be more precise, this is an open issue