This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Large increase in testsuite failures in optimized 3.0 20010613 (prerelease)
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Subject: Re: Large increase in testsuite failures in optimized 3.0 20010613 (prerelease)
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Date: 15 Jun 2001 18:53:04 +0200
- Cc: <ronis at onsager dot chem dot mcgill dot ca>, <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106151741430.2742-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>
"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> writes:
> On 15 Jun 2001, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
>> Is it really ok to commit this on the branch? Please give me an
>> explicit ok (I though only Mark acks the branch but I'm not sure what
>> the situation is for the manual).
>>
>> I'll commit this now on the trunk,
>
> I would think that:
>
> * This patch is useful for people looking at the documentation in the
> release tarball, so it should go on the branch.
I agree.
> * If you can commit it to the mainline, you can commit it to the branch -
;-)
> or at least could up to 0800 UTC today, and there doesn't seem to have
> been any specific announcement of a doc freeze or of the release time
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-06/msg00634.html is silent about the rules
> for doc patches on the branch after 0800 UTC today).
That message says:
"Anyone who would normally be able to approve documentation patches may
continue to do so, through the end of 14th, GMT -0800."
And I'll prefer to wait for Mark's approval or rejection.
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj