This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: c++/3028: 3.0 Compiler complains about template that used to work under 2.95

To: James L Peterson <peterson at austin dot ibm dot com>
Subject: Re: c++/3028: 3.0 Compiler complains about template that used to work under 2.95
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>
Date: 02 Jun 2001 03:15:56 +0200
Cc: Artem Khodush <artem at duma dot gov dot ru>, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CMLA, ENS Cachan -- CNRS UMR 8536 (France)
References: <20010601141933.13459.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> <000901c0eaab$49e7a940$545a9090@duma.gov.ru> <3B17B6B2.A2A0B106@austin.ibm.com>

James L Peterson <peterson@austin.ibm.com> writes:

| I was unable to understand the template description in Stroustrup (3rd
| edition)
| well enough to tell if 3.0 or 2.9.5 was right.  So you may be right that
| 3.0
| is correct.  The argument for 3.0 being wrong is that IListNode is
| defined
| inside IListBase and so has to be effectively "templated" because
| IListBase is.

But GCC-3.0 is right, because IListNode is -not- a template-name.

-- Gaby

References:
- c++/3028: 3.0 Compiler complains about template that used to work under 2.95
  - From: peterson
- Re: c++/3028: 3.0 Compiler complains about template that used to work under 2.95
  - From: Artem Khodush
- Re: c++/3028: 3.0 Compiler complains about template that used to work under 2.95
  - From: James L Peterson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]