This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: GCC bug on PowerPC with gcc 2.95.2?

To: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
Subject: Re: GCC bug on PowerPC with gcc 2.95.2?
From: Cort Dougan <cort at fsmlabs dot com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 17:04:37 -0600
Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010521162656.S19006@ftsoj.fsmlabs.com> <jmbsomcojb.fsf@geoffk.org>

} r1 is the stack pointer.  GCC assumes that if you change it, you meant
} it to be changed.
} 
} Even if GCC saved it, it would save it on the stack, and of course
} then there'd be no way to restore it.

Thanks for the info.  Where can I find documentation on the gcc treatment
of regs and which ones constraints don't affect?

References:
- GCC bug on PowerPC with gcc 2.95.2?
  - From: Cort Dougan
- Re: GCC bug on PowerPC with gcc 2.95.2?
  - From: Geoff Keating

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]