This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: ICE in find_reloads

To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: ICE in find_reloads
From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 15:53:17 +0200
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, rth at cygnus dot com, Philipp Thomas <pthomas at suse dot de>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010326154246.F475@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0103261447010.1131-100000@host140.cambridge.redhat.com>

> On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> 
> > > Mon Mar 26 14:44:03 CEST 2001  Jan Hubicka  <jh@suse.cz>
> > >
> > > 	* i386.md (truncdfsf2_3, trunctfsf2_2): Change predicate to memory_operand.
> > Hi,
> > I've just found that the same bug is present in branch too.  OK to for branch?
> 
> Yes.  But please also verify all the splitters; it isn't entirely obvious
> that we aren't going to generate these patterns with a non-MEM as operand 0.
I've done so few minutes before.  The whole point behind the machinery is
to not generate these and I believe it works - otherwise we would get post-reload
aborts anyway.

Honza
> 
> 
> Bernd

References:
- Re: ICE in find_reloads
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: ICE in find_reloads
  - From: Bernd Schmidt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]