This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Java broken after i386 PIC change

To: Philip Blundell <philb at gnu dot org>
Subject: Re: Java broken after i386 PIC change
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 14:46:29 -0800
Cc: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010120201908.A5004@redhat.com> <3A6A6DB9.2BE0997E@albatross.co.nz> <20010120214647.A5072@redhat.com> <3A6A8E80.951B182A@albatross.co.nz> <3A6A8F9E.34AAFB94@albatross.co.nz> <20010120233505.A5266@redhat.com> <20010121143456.A6305@redhat.com> <20010122170427.A1004@disaster.jaj.com> <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com> <E14Kqlg-0004H1-00@kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org>

On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 11:53:00PM +0000, Philip Blundell wrote:
> If it's broken in 2.10 and works in the mainline, you can just test for
> "2.11 or newer".  It doesn't seem worth legislating for exact snapshots.

I'd been thinking more about testing that the feature we want works.  


r~

References:
- Re: Java broken after i386 PIC change
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Java broken after i386 PIC change
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Java broken after i386 PIC change
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Java broken after i386 PIC change
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Java broken after i386 PIC change
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Java broken after i386 PIC change
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Java broken after i386 PIC change
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Java broken after i386 PIC change
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: Java broken after i386 PIC change
  - From: Philip Blundell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]