This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Bug in g++ --syntax-only

To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: Bug in g++ --syntax-only
From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 01:16:54 -0500
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, Gcc Bug List <bug-gcc at gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <873deo1hn7.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <20010116002459.A32456@disaster.jaj.com> <20010115215546.C27073@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 09:55:46PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 12:24:59AM -0500, Phil Edwards wrote:
> > > I think addition of those -l flags should be disabled when
> > > --syntax-only is given.  I find these messages counterintuitive.
> > 
> > Same here.  Somebody comment on the below patch?
> 
> Ok.

Applied.

-- 
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com  |  pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools.  Fools are protected by more capable fools.

References:
- Bug in g++ --syntax-only
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Bug in g++ --syntax-only
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: Bug in g++ --syntax-only
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]