This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/795
- To: Martin Sebor <sebor at roguewave dot com>
- Subject: Re: c++/795
- From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 09:05:14 +0000
- CC: nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: Codesourcery LLC
- References: <20001124141600.12709.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> <3A1EB56D.31CB7D0@roguewave.com>
Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> I don't think it is ill-formed. From
> http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#30:
thanks, but I don't see how that is relevant. It's talking about something
in a non-template scope. Here we are in the scope of a templated member
function. Besides, disallowing template here would change the validity of
the example between paras 4 and 5 in 14.2, which is currently isomorphic
to this test case.
Do you agree?
nathan
--
Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org