This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: Bootstrapping GCC snapshots fails under Cygwin
- To: "'kelley dot cook at gm dot com'" <kelley dot cook at gm dot com>, tprince at computer dot org
- Subject: RE: Bootstrapping GCC snapshots fails under Cygwin
- From: "Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" <David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:02:20 -0000
- Cc: "'gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>
No progress. All my reported work has been on NT4. I have also tried win2k
recently (on a clunker with 64 MB of RAM) with the same result.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kelley.cook@gm.com [SMTP:kelley.cook@gm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 15 November 2000 4:16
> To: tprince@computer.org; Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
> Subject: Bootstrapping GCC snapshots fails under Cygwin
>
> David and Tim,
>
> I saw your bug reports with the latest GCC dieing in c-decl.c when
> bootstraping
> that latest snapshots.
> After figuring out that it is necessary to add
> "--without-included-gettext" to
> configure. I am still having pretty much the same problem as you did with
> the
> latest snapshots.
>
> Windows 2000 SP1:
>
> $ gcc/stage1/xgcc.exe -v
> Using builtin specs.
> Configured with: --enable-languages=c++,f77,java --with-included-gettext
> gcc version 2.97 20001106 (experimental)
> -------------------
> stage1/xgcc.exe -Bstage1/ -B/usr/local/i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ -c -DIN_GCC
> -g
> -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
> -Wtraditional -pedantic -Wno-long-long -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.
> -I/src/gcc-20001106/gcc -I/src/gcc-20001106/gcc/.
> -I/src/gcc-20001106/gcc/config
> -I/src/gcc-20001106/gcc/../include /src/gcc-20001106/gcc/c-decl.c -o
> c-decl.o
> /src/gcc-20001106/gcc/c-decl.c: In function 'init_decl_processing':
> /src/gcc-20001106/gcc/c-decl.c:3256: Internal error: Segmentation fault.
> Please submit a full bug report.
> See <URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions.
> ----------------
> Did either of you manage to solve the problem and if so how did you do it?
>
> Thank you for your time,
> Kelley Cook
>