This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: x86 bootstrap
- To: Graham Stott <grahams at redhat dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Re: x86 bootstrap
- From: mark at codesourcery dot com
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 17:03:55 +0000 (GMT)
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, rth at cygnus dot com
I've looked at Jan's patch, and it looks OK to me --
except for the canonicalization issue that Richard pointed
out. I can't approve the patch because I don't
quite understand all the issues.
Richard, would you mind going another round with Jan
to resolve this bit?
Jan, it's just not acceptable to have the tree failing to
bootstrap like this -- especially on the platform where
you were making the changes. We're going to need to back
out your previous changes if we can't get this straightened
out in the next 24 hours or so.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
----- Original Message -----
Sent : 10/17/00 9:32 AM
From : Graham Stott <grahams@redhat.com>
To : Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
CC : gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: x86 bootstrap
> Mark
> This is fall out from one of Jan's recent patches.
> Take a look at the "More i386 comparison fixes" patch Jan posted to gcc-patches
> it fixes the problem for me.
> Graham
____________________________________________________
Get MORE than just FREE e-mail. Get a private Web office.
Organize your team with FREE communication and
collaboration tools from HotOffice(R) at www.hotoffice.com.