Re: cpp seems not to include # line "file" output for empty files

[Daniel Berlin <dberlin at redhat dot com>]

Daniel Berlin <dberlin@redhat.com> writes:

> Um, no.
> If it's not using any of a.h, it's not dependent on it, or else it's
> output would be necessary.
> You are using a definition of dependent that happens to fit your task,
> which happens to not be the general definition of dependent.
> 
> You could remove the line including a.h, as it stands now, and a.c
> would not be affected.
> Therefore, a.c is not directly dependendingu on a.h

Of course, I could learn to type depending right one of these days.


> --Dan