This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: nested functions on Arm

To: Michael Meissner <meissner at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: nested functions on Arm
From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 13:25:56 -0700
Cc: rearnsha at arm dot com, Ulrich Drepper <drepper at cygnus dot com>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <m3og1sg4jl.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com> <200009131211.NAA29862@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> <20000913152044.47048@cse.cygnus.com>

On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 03:20:44PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> Either that or you can probably add a new macro that passes the static chain
> register as the first argument (much like we can do for structure returns).

This is almost certainly the correct option.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: nested functions on Arm
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

References:
- nested functions on Arm
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: nested functions on Arm
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: nested functions on Arm
  - From: Michael Meissner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]