This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: NLS related bootstrap failure (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Subject: Re: NLS related bootstrap failure (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
- From: Philipp Thomas <pthomas at suse dot de>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 09:58:20 +0200
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009120944150.14408-100000@deneb.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
* Gerald Pfeifer (pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at) [20000912 09:48]:
> Current CVS on a SuSE 7.0 box. Looks as if my strategy to have a bare bone
> box around for portability testing keeps paying off! :-}
>
> make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/OBJ-1209-09:38/gcc/po'
> touch stamp-check-pot
> file=`echo en_GB | sed 's,.*/,,'`.gmo \
> && rm -f $file && PATH=../src:$PATH no -o $file /cvs/gcc/gcc/po/en_GB.po
> /bin/sh: no: command not found
> make[3]: *** [en_GB.gmo] Error 127
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/OBJ-1209-09:38/gcc/po'
> make[2]: *** [intl.all] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/OBJ-1209-09:38/gcc'
> make[1]: *** [stage_a] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/OBJ-1209-09:38/gcc'
>
> FWIW, the problem looks remarkingly similiar to one we had about two
> months ago, if I remember correctly.
Yeah, it does indeed :( Could you check if renaming texinfo and then
rerunning configure cures it? If yes, this will be cured by the removal of
texinfo for which I'm running the final tests.
Philipp
--
Philipp Thomas <pthomas@suse.de>
Development, SuSE GmbH, Schanzaecker Str. 10, D-90443 Nuremberg, Germany
#define NINODE 50 /* number of in core inodes */
#define NPROC 30 /* max number of processes */
-- Version 7 UNIX for PDP 11, /usr/include/sys/param.h