This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Segmentation fault building libg++ without named returns
- To: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca (John David Anglin)
- Subject: Re: Segmentation fault building libg++ without named returns
- From: "John David Anglin" <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>
- Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 02:06:54 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
> The tFix test fails. Not sure what is going on here but for most of the
> other classes there seems to be weak definitions for the class constructors,
> etc. Here is the log:
The failure doesn't occur under hpux 10.20 (only i686 linux). As noted
before, there aren't any weak symbol defines in Fix.o when built under
i686 linux. For example,
hpux:
U strstreambuf::~strstreambuf(void)
00000000 W Fix::~Fix(void)
4000000c D Fix::Rep_0
40000014 D Fix::Rep_m1
linux:
U strstreambuf::~strstreambuf(void)
0000000c D Fix::Rep_0
00000014 D Fix::Rep_m1
Dave
--
J. David Anglin dave.anglin@nrc.ca
National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)