This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [G95-develop] Should g77 accept file extensions .f90 and .f95 ?
- To: g95 developer's mailing list <g95-develop at lists dot sourceforge dot net>,gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, Charlie Zender <zender at uci dot edu>
- Subject: Re: [G95-develop] Should g77 accept file extensions .f90 and .f95 ?
- From: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 21:49:29 +0200
- Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
- References: <39B0CF1B.D8E506B@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
Toon Moene wrote:
> Saturday, 2nd of September, 2000, I wrote:
> A few days ago, Charlie Zender wrote on gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org:
> > It is often useful to preprocess fortran code with a C-preprocessor.
> > It would be really great if the preprocessor component of GCC were
> > modified to treat *.F90 (Fortran 90) files exactly as it treats *.F
> > files.
However, contrary to my assumptions, g77 doesn't recognise the .f90 or
.F90 extension, so I summed up the alternatives I could implement.
Subsequently, the majority agreed with my number 3 alternative:
> 3. Or should g77 refrain from even purporting it has anything to do
> with Fortran 90/95 and simply refuse to recognise extensions
> .f90 and .f95 given that GNU Fortran 95 is well under way ?
so I'll refrain from changing g77 in this regard.
Sorry, Charlie.
Regards,
--
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)