This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Testsuite failure ?


David Ronis wrote:
> 
> I just uploaded a new set of testsuite results for gcc-ss-20000821
> obtained after upgrading binutils from 2.10(release) to Binutils
> (2.9.1.0.7) GNU ld version 2.10.90 (with BFD 2.10.90) [today's CVS].
> 
> The testsuites show essentially no improvements [well, perhaps I'm
> being a bit harsh, the number of g++ unexpected failures is now 805
> instead of 806].  The URL's for the two cases are:
> 
>      http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2000-08/msg00205.html
> 
> and
> 
>      http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2000-08/msg00181.html

David, I'm afraid most of the failures are caused by the set of
compilation flags you are using for running "make bootstrap"; I'm
normally using something like

  BOOT_CFLAGS="-O9 -march=i686 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer"

i.e. omit all the -fforce-mem -fforce-addr -ffast-math -malign-*
flags. However, the g++ compiler wasn't in too good shape during the
fast few days. Maybe that caused your problems.

> 
> The typical error message is now different though; e.g.,
> 
> PASS: g++.dg/special/conpr-1.C (test for excess errors)
> spawn [open ...]
> FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-1.C execution test
> 
> Is this real or does something else have to be upgraded?

Which dejagnu version are you using? I have a recent checkout from
sources.redhat.com for that as well....

>  I've run a
> couple of the testcases from the command line and things seem to run
> without generating error messages or nonzero exit codes.
> 
> David

Cheers, manfred.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]