This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Huge regression...


On Aug  4, 2000, Zack Weinberg <zack@wolery.cumb.org> wrote:

> - A recent patch to the toplevel configure script added an -I for
>   libio/stdio

Oops, that's me :-)

IIRC, I borrowed that flag from the libstdc++-v3 configuration stuff,
and wondered how come libstdc++ had managed to work without it.

Thanks for figuring it out.

>   I believe this is always wrong.  I might be mistaken, but it is
>   definitely wrong for targets where libio is included in libc.

Indeed.

> 	* configure.in (libstdcxx_flags): Remove -isystem $$s/libio/stdio.
> 	(target switch): Accept -linux* not just -linux-gnu*.

> 	* libio/configure.in: Honor --disable-shared.
> 	(target switch): Accept -linux* not just -linux-gnu*.

> 	* libstdc++/configure.in: Honor --disable-shared.
> 	(target switch): Accept -linux* not just -linux-gnu*.

I'm not sure if Jeff Law has already brought up to the SC the issue of
making me an official maintainer of the configure stuff, but, I think
I can approve at least the removal of `-isystem $$s/libio/stdio' :-).
The rest looks ok to me too.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]