This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[sanvila@unex.es: Re: Bug#57136: gettext: please apply patch from GCC developers to support --keyword=WORD:3]
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, drepper at cygnus dot com
- Subject: [sanvila@unex.es: Re: Bug#57136: gettext: please apply patch from GCC developers to support --keyword=WORD:3]
- From: Zack Weinberg <zack at wolery dot cumb dot org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:36:52 -0700
I got this from the Debian gettext maintainer. I had asked him to
apply the patch for --keyword=WORD:3 to their package, since the next
release of gettext is not happening anytime soon. He did this, and
has now found a problem with the patch.
I think we need a ; after the 'done', as well as a backslash at the
end of that line.
----- Forwarded message from Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> -----
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 20:24:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack@wolery.cumb.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#57136: gettext: please apply patch from GCC developers to support --keyword=WORD:3
On Sat, 5 Feb 2000, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Package: gettext
> Version: 0.10.35-13
> Severity: wishlist
>
> The currently released version of gettext is not capable of regenerating
> the .po file for GCC. A patch is included with the GCC development snapshots.
> It would be nice if this patch could be applied to the Debian package of
> gettext.
Hello.
I've received two reports saying there is a missing `\' here:
> diff -pu -r0.10.35.0 -r0.10.35.1
> --- intl/Makefile.in 1998/04/27 21:53:18 0.10.35.0
> +++ intl/Makefile.in 1998/07/09 21:39:18 0.10.35.1
> @@ -143,10 +143,14 @@ install-data: all
> installcheck:
>
> uninstall:
> - dists="$(DISTFILES.common)"; \
> - for file in $$dists; do \
> - rm -f $(gettextsrcdir)/$$file; \
> - done
> + if test "$(PACKAGE)" = "gettext"; then \
> + dists="$(DISTFILES.common)"; \
> + for file in $$dists; do \
> + rm -f $(gettextsrcdir)/$$file; \
> + done
^^^^^
> + else \
> + : ; \
> + fi
So I'm going to add it to the Debian version.
Do you know whether or not GCC developers are aware of this?
Thanks.
----- End forwarded message -----