This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: NLS vs. rtl.c

To: pthomas at suse dot de
Subject: Re: NLS vs. rtl.c
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:30:02 -0700
Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <20000628225525Y.mitchell@codesourcery.com><20000629115147.A10933@Jeffreys.suse.de><20000629123236.A17280@Jeffreys.suse.de>

>>>>> "Philipp" == Philipp Thomas <pthomas@suse.de> writes:

    Philipp> * Philipp Thomas (pthomas@suse.de) [20000629 11:55]:

    >> 1) I'll revert the changes to rtl.c . It's only used for the
    >> gen* programs and thus should not use NLS.
    >> 
    >> 2) I'll only commit changes after doing the required bootstrap.

    Philipp> OK, I didn't bootstrap, but stage1 compiler builds.
    Philipp> Commit like this:

Thanks for fixing this.  Since you were doing emergency triage, it's
OK that you didn't bootstrap before check in.  But, you should still
watch the bootstrap now.  And in future, please do not make any
check-ins without bootstrapping -- even if the changes seem "obvious".

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

References:
- NLS vs. rtl.c
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: NLS vs. rtl.c
  - From: Philipp Thomas
- Re: NLS vs. rtl.c
  - From: Philipp Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]