This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bad assembly output from g++, 2.95.2
- To: jakob at ostenfeld dot dtu dot dk
- Subject: Re: Bad assembly output from g++, 2.95.2
- From: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin at loewis dot home dot cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 08:22:31 +0200
- CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20000627223356.A19686@ostenfeld.dtu.dk>
> I was just wondering if this would ring a bell to anyone. I don't
> have a small test-case to provoke the error (yet), I just wanted to
> hear whether someone could say ``it's fixed in 2.96'' or something
> along those lines.
Thanks for your bug report. I believe the answer to that question is
no. Please note that you don't have to provide a small test case; just
sending the preprocessor output for the file would be fine, see
http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html
> By the way, the most stable C++ compiler yet, would that be 2.96, or
> still 2.95.2 ?
2.95.2 is the most stable C++ compiler yet.
Regards,
Martin