This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: g++ -vs- libgcj

To: tromey at cygnus dot com
Subject: Re: g++ -vs- libgcj
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 16:34:12 -0700
Cc: bug-gcc at gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <878zw1xqeo.fsf@creche.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-shoot-me>

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <tromey@cygnus.com> writes:

    Tom> I'd like to recommend that C++ front end changes be used to
    Tom> rebuild libgcj on a regular basis.  libgcj uses some g++
    Tom> features that nobody else uses (e.g., `extern "Java"').  We
    Tom> see g++ breakage much more frequently than we'd like.

What are the obstacles to putting libgcj in the tree at this point?
This is the single best, and likely the only, way to really ensure
that libgcj is built before checkins.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: g++ -vs- libgcj
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

References:
- g++ -vs- libgcj
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]