This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: VAX Ultrix bootstrap failure with gcc-2.96
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: VAX Ultrix bootstrap failure with gcc-2.96
- From: "John David Anglin" <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 16:11:36 -0400 (EDT)
Forwarded message:
From zack@wolery.cumb.org Wed May 24 14:37:44 EDT 2000
From: Zack Weinberg <zack@wolery.cumb.org>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 11:37:23 -0700
To: John David Anglin <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, egcs-bugs@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: VAX Ultrix bootstrap failure with gcc-2.96
Message-ID: <20000524113723.Q3314@wolery.cumb.org>
References: <no.id> <200005241725.NAA10242@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <200005241725.NAA10242@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>; from dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca on Wed, May 24, 2000 at 01:25:09PM -0400
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 01:25:09PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > cc1: Invalid option `-Wno-long-long'
> > In file included from ../../gcc/cppmain.c:25:
> > ../../gcc/cpplib.h:189: warning: ANSI C does not support `long long'
>
> After several false starts, I think the following patch is a reasonable
> approach to fixing the problem. The definition of the warning CFLAGS
> for stage 1 and 2 is moved to configure. The configure code could be
> easily modified to support more option tests if that is needed at some
> point in the future.
You might want to turn off -pedantic if -Wno-long-long is not
available, since you will get floods of warnings about long long
otherwise.
Could you move the definition of LOOSE_CFLAGS into configure as well?
This would reduce the number of times sed is executed during the
build.
zw
--
J. David Anglin dave.anglin@nrc.ca
National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)