This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: gcc-2.95.3 April 12 incomplete C++ thunks patch breaks Linux/ia32

To: Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.3 April 12 incomplete C++ thunks patch breaks Linux/ia32
From: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin at loewis dot home dot cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 23:04:52 +0200
CC: hjl at lucon dot org, dje at watson dot ibm dot com, law at cygnus dot com, loewis at informatik dot hu-berlin dot de, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <200005181655.MAA24902@mal-ach.watson.ibm.com><200005181655.MAA24902@mal-ach.watson.ibm.com> <4.3.1.2.20000518192116.00c18360@mail.lauterbach.com>

> Even with this patch applied there's still a regression on 
> powerpc-linux-gnu if you run the C++ testsuite with -O2. Does it really 
> work for you on x86?

I'm quite certain that the behaviour of these patches should not
change under optimization; so any problems you see are likely
unrelated.

Regards,
Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc-2.95.3 April 12 incomplete C++ thunks patch breaks Linux/ia32
  - From: Franz Sirl

References:
- gcc-2.95.3 April 12 incomplete C++ thunks patch breaks Linux/ia32
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: gcc-2.95.3 April 12 incomplete C++ thunks patch breaks Linux/ia32
  - From: Franz Sirl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]