This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Serious error-causing change in new CPP's -traditional behavior

To: Zack Weinberg <zack at wolery dot cumb dot org>
Subject: Re: Serious error-causing change in new CPP's -traditional behavior
From: Neil Booth <NeilB at earthling dot net>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 07:15:38 +0900
Cc: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>, thorpej at zembu dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20000508144323.B14208@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> <200005091107.MAA25010@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> <20000510100533.T21854@wolery.cumb.org>

Zack Weinberg wrote:- > A marginally better stupid game: > > #define IMMED(n) # ##n > #define foo() mov r0, IMMED(5) Or I could just get the lexer to drop all CPP_HASH tokens that are not the first token (so we still allow directives) if the assembler option is true? Neil.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Serious error-causing change in new CPP's -traditional behavior
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: Serious error-causing change in new CPP's -traditional behavior
  - From: Zack Weinberg

References:
- Re: Serious error-causing change in new CPP's -traditional behavior
  - From: Jason R Thorpe
- Re: Serious error-causing change in new CPP's -traditional behavior
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: Serious error-causing change in new CPP's -traditional behavior
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]