This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: cpp problem in 20000417 snapshot

To: Zack Weinberg <zack at wolery dot cumb dot org>
Subject: Re: cpp problem in 20000417 snapshot
From: Neil Booth <NeilB at earthling dot net>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 17:14:12 +0900
Cc: Michael Schwingen <michaels at stochastik dot rwth-aachen dot de>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20000503153757.07341@nemesis.stochastik.rwth-aachen.de> <20000503084534.E29519@wolery.cumb.org>

Zack Weinberg wrote:- > This would be a natural extension, and I see that 2.95 did accept it > (silently, even with -pedantic!) I'll consider restoring it. > Does anyone else have an opinion. I vote for being as strict as we can, without breaking large code bases. i.e. unless similar complaints come in for a variety of other pieces of software I vote we don't restore it. Neil.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: cpp problem in 20000417 snapshot
  - From: Michael Schwingen

References:
- cpp problem in 20000417 snapshot
  - From: Michael Schwingen
- Re: cpp problem in 20000417 snapshot
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]