Company "signature" (Re: broken strlen)

[Marco Franzen <Marco dot Franzen at Thyron dot com>]

On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
>   > This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the
>   > individual to whom it is addressed.
[...see below again, I am afraid]
> This is considered poor etiquette for this list.  What's the point of
> attaching this kind of signature to a message going to a highly public
> list?

It is appended by the mail gateway of the company I work for, without leaving
me a choice.   I understand, sympathise with and apologise for the uneasy
feeling it causes in you. 

As long as I address my email to a (semi-)public list like this as "the
individual" (or as one of several "individuals"), the condition should be void
anyway, I suppose  But I will raise the issue with management. Thanks for
pointing it out.

> jeff

[the following single line alone comprises my personal signature]
-- Marco
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual to whom it is addressed.
Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of Thyron Limited.
If you are not the intended recipient then please be advised
that you have received this email in error and that any use,
dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email
is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the
Thyron IT Administrator on +44 (0)1923 236 050 or
send an email to mail-admin@thyron.com.
Thank You