This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: C++: current 2.96 now too strict at access control

To: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin at loewis dot home dot cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
Subject: Re: C++: current 2.96 now too strict at access control
From: Alfred Minarik <a8601248 at unet dot univie dot ac dot at>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 14:28:35 +0100
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <38B4CC0C.B8F8132F@unet.univie.ac.at> <200002241008.LAA01159@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de>

"Martin v. Loewis" wrote:
> 
> Thanks for your bug report. I'm not so sure it is a bug in gcc. I
> think your code is ill-formed, and should be corrected as
> 
And once again you have hit the nail on the head.

So I think it's time to say, as I hope
with unanimous approval of all gcc users,
the best thanks for your work of initial
valuation of bug reports.

Not only is this a quite unnoticed work,
it seems to be very time consuming and often
frustrating with all those incomplete reports.

And then you answer with such an elaborated
reasoning...

Again, thank you very much!

Alfred

Follow-Ups:
- Re: C++: current 2.96 now too strict at access control
  - From: Tomislav Goles
- Re: C++: current 2.96 now too strict at access control
  - From: Martin v. Loewis

References:
- C++: current 2.96 now too strict at access control
  - From: Alfred Minarik
- Re: C++: current 2.96 now too strict at access control
  - From: Martin v. Loewis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]