This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Still a lot of C++ files getting "fixed"
- To: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: Still a lot of C++ files getting "fixed"
- From: Zack Weinberg <zack at wolery dot cumb dot org>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 22:00:31 -0800
- Cc: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, austern at sgi dot com, autogen at linuxbox dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, mark at codesourcery dot com
- References: <20000126133103.B16770@wolery.cumb.org> <3508.949328583@upchuck>
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 07:23:03AM -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> In message <20000126133103.B16770@wolery.cumb.org>you write:
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 03:03:20PM -0500, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> > > > From: Zack Weinberg <zack@wolery.cumb.org>
> > > >
> > > > Who owns cccp?
> > > > zw
> > >
> > > IMO, the same people who own cpplib should own cccp/cexp.y etc. If
> > > only because they need to keep their behaviors in sync. Perhaps we
> > > should make this explicit in the MAINTAINERS file?
> >
> > I'm willing to take that responsibility, but it's up to the steering
> > committee.
>
> It's yours :-) Though we should consider the old cpp stuff is
> maintenance mode only now -- we fix critical bugs, but that should
> be it. Our focus should be on the cpplib version. We should expect
> to zap the old cpp code after the next major release.
Okay. In that case I will not patch cccp to accept #endif labels in
system headers.
> [ Which reminds me -- a patch to remove the old slow fixincludes
> code would be greatly appreciated :-) ]
Which old slow fixincludes code? The script loose in gcc/, the shell
script that gets run if the C version doesn't compile, the smaller
shell scripts that get used on some platforms only...
zw