This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Bootstrap failure on alpha-osf5 building stage1 libgcc.a (was Re: osf5 long double support)
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Bootstrap failure on alpha-osf5 building stage1 libgcc.a (was Re: osf5 long double support)
- From: Andrew Hobson <ahobson at eng dot mindspring dot net>
- Date: 25 Jan 2000 13:28:58 -0500
- Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
- References: <20000123201640.A25059@cygnus.com>
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000 20:16:40 -0800, Richard Henderson <rth@cygnus.com>
said:
> As far as I know, this change to long double is the only
> compiler visible change between DU and Tru64. If someone
> could confirm that, I'd appreciate it.
I checked out the latest snapshort from CVS (gcc_ss_20000124), but I
get a compilation error that is probably unrelated:
$ CC=cc ../configure --enable-languages=c++
[ ... ]
$ gmake bootstrap
[ ... ]
_fixunsdfdi
xgcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
gmake[4]: *** [libgcc2.a] Error 1
[ ... ]
$ uname -a
OSF1 gamma.eng.mindspring.net V5.0 910 alpha
$ sizer -v
Digital UNIX V5.0 (Rev. 910); Tue Oct 12 19:18:06 EDT 1999
I saw a bug report that looked similar to this one, but the posted fix
is in the gcc/config/alpha/alpha.c that I have.
$ cvs status gcc/config/alpha/alpha.c
===================================================================
File: alpha.c Status: Up-to-date
Working revision: 1.110
Repository revision: 1.110 /cvs/gcc/egcs/gcc/config/alpha/alpha.c,v
Sticky Tag: (none)
Sticky Date: (none)
Sticky Options: (none)
I was also unable to bootstrap the gcc_ss_20000117 snapshot.
Drew