Re: PATCH for gcc2.95 vxworks5.4 compilers

[Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>]

  In message <199908251914.MAA18516@rtl.cygnus.com>you write:
  > In article <3879.935566217@upchuck.cygnus.com> you write:
  > >If other versions of vxworks have a different definition of size_t, then y
  > ou
  > >will need to make new configuration files for vxworks 5.4.
  > 
  > i960 vxworks 5.0 used "unsigned long", but it appears that all versions
  > from 5.1 and later use "unsigned int".  I don't have any 5.0 versions other
  > than i960 to look at.
  > 
  > I believe there are still people using i960-vxworks5.0, so we shouldn't
  > break that target.  Perhaps a special configuration file just for vxworks
  > 5.0 is the right solution.
Or more correctly a configuration file for 5.0 and older versions of vxworks
and another configuration file for 5.1 (?) and later versions.
jeff