This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH for gcc2.95 vxworks5.4 compilers
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: PATCH for gcc2.95 vxworks5.4 compilers
- From: "Brad M. Garcia" <bgarcia at fore dot com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 12:07:19 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Brad M. Garcia wrote:
> I also have the 5.3.1 header files, and it is "unsigned int" there as
> well. Does anybody know if vxworks ever defined size_t as anything but
> "unsigned int"?
I dug up some 5.2 header files. size_t is defined as "unsigned int"
in these as well.
Can we assume that all versions of vxworks have size_t defined in this
manner and just make the change? Does anybody even test gcc against
versions of vxworks older than 5.x?
Brad Garcia
___/ __ / __ / ___/ "I'm very good at being concise
__/ / / / _/ __/ at the expense of information"
_/ ____/ _/ _| ____/ - me