This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH to rs6000.md, comments?
- To: "David S. Miller" <davem at dm dot cobaltmicro dot com>
- Subject: Re: PATCH to rs6000.md, comments?
- From: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 13:28:13 +0200
- Cc: law at cygnus dot com, egcs-bugs at cygnus dot com, egcs-patches at cygnus dot com
- References: <199807160934.CAA17743@dm.cobaltmicro.com><21909.900547375@hurl.cygnus.com><21909.900547375@hurl.cygnus.com><199807160934.CAA17743@dm.cobaltmicro.com>
At 11:40 16.07.98 , David S. Miller wrote:
> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 11:35:56 +0200
> From: Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com>
>
> David, one question, there are 2 or 3 constructs like the ones
> below in rs6000.c, should I return 1 for CONSTANT_P_RTX in both
> cases?
>
>Yes, if it allows CONST_INT in any case then change it to allow
>CONSTANT_P_RTX in all cases as well.
Ok, thanks. I was not sure about these constructs that complement each
other (eg. logical/non_logical).
Franz.